TTT: Im with / I see suggestion.

[michaelrule4]

Please merge the two, it'd make more sense if they were both merged into one command and the one which is said is dependent on the distance between Player A and Player B.

[Bad King Urgrain]

What if you want to lie?

[Not a Rapist]

Encouraging lying? In your game?

You, sir, should be ashamed.

[Handy_man]

the game is based around deception...

[GrayScare0]

I'm sorry, but that's an awful idea.  I make use of both commands extensively, and I have my reasons for using "I'm with" at great distances and "I see" at close distances occasionally.  For one thing, sometimes you can be close to someone without actually being with them--perhaps there is some obstacle between you two, but you can still target the other player.  There's also obviously the deception factor.  You can scare off traitors by making it look like you're not alone, and you can pretend to conveniently be with someone you're framing as a traitor.  Sometimes it's useful to scare a suspected traitor by claiming you're with them from afar; they may become paranoid or otherwise distracted from their work.  Also, being "with" someone means different things in different situations.  It can imply traveling with the other player or working together with him/her.  There's no sense to changing the two.  They're both very useful as they are.